上海某公司就一手机摄影镜头的驱动装置在中国获得发明专利权,该公司认为日本某电子公司在中国的子公司制造的透镜驱动元件侵犯了其发明专利权,便向法院提起专利侵权之诉,要求被告停止侵权行为,并赔偿原告经济损失。日本某电子公司接到子公司转来的诉状后,便委托我所代理应诉。接受委托后,我们立即组织力量进行文献检索,并及时向国家知识产权局专利复审委员会提出宣告涉案发明专利权无效的请求,同时向法院申请中止本案的审理,等无效宣告案件终结后再开庭审理此侵权诉讼案件。此外,承办律师与专利代理人及时对被诉产品与原告专利保护范围进行认真分析与比对,认为被诉产品的技术特征未落入原告专利权的保护范围。为慎重起见,经日本公司的同意,我们又将被诉产品委托有资质的司法鉴定机构进行技术鉴定,所得出的鉴定结论与我方的分析结查完全相同。在此情形下,被告将上述司法鉴定报告提交给法院,并请求法院依法驳回原告的诉讼请求。

       Shanghai Company vs. Japanese electronics company for patent infringement.
       Shanghai Company has Chinese patent right on” mobile phone camera drive units” and challenge the patent infringement by the mirror drive components from the subsidiary company of the Japanese electronics company. The Shanghai Company filed a lawsuit against the Japanese electronics company and requested to stop infringement and compensated damages. The Defendant Japanese electronics company entrusted our lawyer to answer the case when it received Complaint. Our lawyers team quickly arrange the prior art search for involved patent and filed invalidation request in SIPO to challenge the patent. Meanwhile our lawyer also presented request to the Court to suspend the litigation case, based on the ongoing invalidation procedure. Furthermore our team of lawyer and patent attorney made internal analysis on the evidence from Plaintiff and its patent to find out the technical features did not fallen into the protection scope of invention patent. In order to strengthen the rebuttal, third party’s expert analysis was arranged to confirm our allegation. Thereafter all the documents and evidences are presented to the Court and request the Court to reject the litigation requests of the plaintiff.

台湾某科技公司诉深圳某公司实用新型专利侵权案件

上一篇

下一篇

上海某公司诉日本某电子公司发明专利侵权案件

添加时间:

本网站由阿里云提供云计算及安全服务 Powered by CloudDream